Skip to content

Why Teachers Like Me Support Unions

March 22, 2011

SF Demonstration

This blog entry is part of a coordinated effort called EduSolidarity.

Find more posts at EduSolidarity.org, or via Twitter.

I wrote recently about my union pride, and my great-uncle, Phil.  But before I was old enough to understand and appreciate Phil’s experience, I was forming my ideas about workers and unions from singers like Woody Guthrie, Billy Bragg, and Bruce Springsteen, and authors like John Steinbeck and Arthur Miller.  In song, books, movies, it always seemed clear that the good guys had to join together to fight against the power of the company or the factory, or end up with no prospects, no hope, no dignity.

In my early adulthood, I began, without thinking much about it, doing non-union work in unionized workplaces.  I had internships, entry level and day jobs in theaters, radio and television production.  I didn’t entirely understand the processes, but there were exceptions that allowed for certain roles to be filled by non-union members.  If I was making any money at all, it wasn’t much, and all I knew about the union was that certain people had certain roles, and that I was not to do any portion of their jobs.  At the time, it seemed silly that I couldn’t lift or move certain objects, that I couldn’t touch certain equipment.  Still, I understood the overall importance of the union: these were all jobs where it would have been easy for an employer to keep modifying the expectations – skip your break time, work an extra hour or two for the same rate, help those guys hang lighting faster, edit those tapes for later use. While efficiencies and profits are essential for a business to thrive, however, there are issues of both equity and saftety when rules change and individual workers are pressed to compromise or lose their jobs.

I began teaching English when I lived in Israel for a year, and took a variety of part-time jobs with a public school, an after-school program, and two language schools that offered private instruction.  My first two teaching jobs in the U.S. were in private schools, with a year of student teaching in between.  All together, I’d been teaching in one form or another for several years by the time I landed in a California public school.  There, I finally became a union member in my local teachers’ association and in CTA.  I’m now in a second California public school, finishing my ninth year there, and my twelfth year as a union member.

I’ve had my doubts about the union.  I didn’t really like the way union leaders at my prior school demanded that meetings had to end at a precise minute and second, even if we might have benefitted from letting the principal finish speaking.  I still don’t think we should demand to be paid according to our salary scale for non-teaching time (which is not to say I think we should give away our time, either).  I’ve sometimes questioned CTA positions on statewide issues, and thought they could do a better job of leading on certain issues.  At the same time, I’ve always felt I had recourse, to speak to my colleagues, to take my questions or concerns to union leadership, and to involve myself in the union when there are opportunities.

I’m also proud of the times that I’ve seen union leadership make a positive difference in the education of students, by resisting censorship, promoting effective teacher evaluation policies, and supporting professional development.  I can add that I have aggressively pursued my own professional development and implemented new ideas in my classroom with confidence that my union-negotiated contract will help ensure fair treatment if a new principal comes along who doesn’t agree with my teaching or grading practices.

Ultimately, despite my doubts or concerns, I’ve retained some of that youthful confidence that the union is necessary and good.  I don’t intend to suggest that  problems don’t exist, but ultimately, I would find it even more naïve or optimistic to imagine that school boards, superintendents, and administrators will always exercise good judgment in education policy in the absence of an organized body of teachers and school employees on the other side of a bargaining table.  Let’s concede that the inverse is true as well, that in the absence of negotiations with effective leaders and management, teachers might go too far in our demands and expectations  without heeding fiscal or political realities that warrant consideration.  With strong, ethical advocacy from both sides, balanced by mutual respect and a tough of humility, negotiations are the path to better policy.

I think if you look at many successful school systems, including mine, you’ll find that there is a healthy and collegial relationship between management and labor.  In the current political climate, the chances of maintaining that good will are diminishing, and there may not even be a chance of establishing that good will where it is currently lacking.  But let’s not allow the current economic crisis be the excuse for disempowering our unions.  The concept of checks and balances has served our democracy well, and it can serve our public workplace well, too.

To those critics who say public unions have too much influence over elected officials, I’d respond that the problem isn’t the union as much as the influence.  If those critics will join efforts at campaign finance reform that allows for more indpendence among elected officials, they’ll be more credible.  It might take public financing of campaigns, or a constitutional amendment to correct the notion of corporate personhood, but that’s a conversation we should have.  To those critics who argue the union is buying political influence with taxpayer money, I’d say it’s no longer taxpayer money at that point.  It was mine, briefly, and now it’s the union’s.  If you want to be credible on that count, then no corporation receiving public contracts should be allowed to lobby or make campaign contributions either.  Can we have that conversation?  But if they’re just trying to eliminate collective bargaining, I’m sticking with the union.

6 Comments leave one →
  1. Lynne Formigli permalink
    March 23, 2011 1:58 pm

    Many times teachers refer to unions as a separate entity. It’s important to remember the union is the teachers. Yes, we elect leaders to take certain responsibilities, but we are the union. If we don’t like what our leaders are doing, it’s our responsibility to support people who will better represent us, or step up ourselves. I have never seen a better example of democracy in action as I have watching how my unions (local, state and national) work.

    Our power comes from collective action. If a corporation wants to influence the political process, they write a check. While we do leverage lots of small contributions from individual members, we will never be able to compete dollar for dollar. Our power has always been getting our members to the phone banks, walking precincts, writing letters to the editor, calling their elected officials, packing school boards, marching in the street (and lately using facebook and other new media). I can tell you from my own phone banking experience, people listen when you tell them you are a teacher. This has always been where our power lies. If the members aren’t behind our leaders, we can’t be effective. Our leaders know this.

    I support my union because it is made up of teachers, and there is no group of individuals I trust more to do the right thing for our schools and our kids.

  2. September 13, 2012 7:41 pm

    Like a revolving door, students, parents, administrators, superintendents, board members, venture philanthropists, and venture politicians gyrate through our public school systems. Often, each layer and new generation capriciously proposes new and old unproven ideas for achieving their latest ideals.

    In the private sector world, board members are usually paid and united behind a common mission to improve profits. In contrast, the complicated world of public education has unpaid board members with varying loyalties and sometimes personal and political agendas that trump the mission of public education. School boards, also quite often attract well-meaning individuals not schooled in public school matters and business leaders who hope to inject their business worldview into our uniquely educational world.

    Most often, it is professional educators, aided by their unions, who keep the merry-go-round of school reforms and leadership from careening the entire public school system out of control or into the control of entrepreneurs and politicalprenuers of many sorts. It is professional educators and their unions that provide steadiness, perspective, and common mission to an otherwise erratic organization that sees a constant turnover of board members, superintendents, administrators, parents, and students.

    Our students need stability. Teachers and their unions deliver this.

    http://oneteachersperspective.blogspot.com/2012/03/collective-bargaining-is-vital-to.html

Trackbacks

  1. Why Teachers Like Me Support Unions « InterACT | Midia Social
  2. This is What #EDUSolidarity Looks Like – The Full List « Outside the Cave
  3. 2011 InterACT in Retrospect « InterACT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: